![]() This policy brief elaborates these key findings and concludes with recommendations to a range of key actors. ![]() Nevertheless, there is significant scope to strengthen the legal status of specific protections to women’s rights to improve how key institutions comply with and implement their own guarantees of women’s rights to improve coordination amongst key institutions and to maximise the strengths of different monitoring and enforcement procedures to protect and promote different women’s rights in different conflict settings. ![]() The increase in institutional activity is a broadly positive development. Key institutions of relevance include the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), human rights treaty-bodies, the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). Consequently, there is now a wide range of international institutions engaged in defining, monitoring and enforcing women’s rights in different conflicts under international law. Protections for women’s rights in armed conflict (WRAC) have proliferated under international law in the last three decades.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |